Back to Blog
How-To 9 min read

AI Citation Strategy: How to Get Your Brand Cited by ChatGPT and Gemini

91% of AI-generated answers cite third-party sources — not brand websites. Reddit. Reviews. Publishers. Here's a practical programme for building the citations that drive AI recommendations.

Paul Byrne February 2026

Most brands approach AI visibility by optimising their own website. Better content. Structured data. Faster load times. These things help, but they address roughly 9% of the problem.

The other 91% is what the rest of the internet says about you. Reddit threads. Trustpilot reviews. Comparison blogs. Industry coverage. Expert roundups. These are the sources AI platforms cite. These are the sources that determine whether your brand appears in the answer.

A citation strategy for AI is not link-building. It's building genuine third-party presence in the places AI systems trust. Here's how to approach it systematically.

91% of AI-generated answers cite third-party sources. Reddit accounts for ~40% of AI citations. Gemini cites sources in 30.4% of responses. ChatGPT cites in 28.6%. Your own website accounts for approximately 9% of AI brand mentions.

Where AI Citations Actually Come From

Understanding the citation hierarchy is the starting point for building a strategy. Not all sources are equal, and the mix varies by platform.

Source Type AI Citation Weight Notes
Reddit Very high (~40% of citations) Peer recommendations carry significant trust signal
Review platforms High Trustpilot, G2, Google Reviews — volume and recency matter
Industry publications High Trade press, vertical media, respected blogs
Comparison/best-of articles High "Top 10 [category]" content directly referenced in AI answers
News coverage Medium-high National and specialist media mentions
Brand website Low (~9%) Useful for structured data extraction, not primary citation source

This hierarchy should dictate where you spend your effort. If your current strategy is 80% focused on your own website, you're investing in the lowest-leverage channel.

The Four-Layer Citation Programme

Layer 1: Reddit — The Highest-Leverage Channel

Reddit accounts for approximately 40% of AI citations across major platforms. When someone asks ChatGPT which accounting software to use and it draws from r/smallbusiness, that thread is doing more work for the brands mentioned in it than their own websites are doing.

The strategic approach to Reddit is genuine community contribution — not promotion. Promotional content gets downvoted and removed. Genuine helpfulness gets upvoted and stays. Here's what works:

One important note: Reddit moderators ban promotional accounts aggressively. The approach that works is building real credibility as a community contributor, not seeding mentions. The brands that do this well use their genuine expertise as the value they bring — it works because it's real.

Layer 2: Review Platform Volume

Review platforms — Trustpilot, G2, Capterra, Google Reviews, Clutch, or whichever is most relevant to your category — are the second most cited source type in AI answers. They serve as social proof signals. When ChatGPT or Gemini forms a view of your brand, review volume and ratings are part of the data.

The specific approach:

Layer 3: Comparison and Best-Of Content

Articles that compare providers in a category — "best project management software for remote teams," "top travel insurance providers in the UK," "B2B SaaS tools for sales teams in 2026" — are directly referenced by AI when answering recommendation queries. Getting your brand into these articles is a high-leverage citation move.

Layer 4: Industry Publication Coverage

A mention in a respected industry publication carries authority weight that no amount of on-site content can replicate. Trade press, vertical media, national business coverage — these sources are trusted by AI systems at a level that positions them above most other citation types.

What Makes a Citation Stick

Not all citations are equal in AI terms. The citations that create lasting visibility share specific characteristics.

Independence. AI systems discount content that reads as self-promotional. A review that sounds like marketing copy is treated with lower trust than a review that sounds like a genuine customer account. Third-party content written by people with no commercial relationship to your brand carries more weight.

Specificity. Citations that include specific details — product features, pricing tiers, named use cases, measurable outcomes — are extracted by AI more reliably than vague endorsements. "They helped us increase qualified leads by 34% in Q3" is a more citable statement than "they were really helpful."

Recency. For real-time AI platforms (ChatGPT with Bing, Gemini), recently indexed content carries more weight than older content. A review from last week outranks one from two years ago in real-time citation contexts. This means citation-building is an ongoing programme, not a one-time project.

Source authority. A citation from a site with high domain authority and established readership carries more weight than one from a new or low-authority site. This is why industry publications matter more than unknown blogs, and why Reddit outperforms most content aggregators.

Realistic Timelines

AI citation strategies take time to show results. Here's a realistic picture of the timeline:

The brands that will dominate AI recommendations in two years are the ones building citation programmes now. The barrier to entry is lower today than it will be when the majority of marketing teams recognise what's happening.

Measuring Citation Programme Progress

Track these metrics monthly to understand whether your programme is working:

The last metric — AI citation rate — is the outcome you're building toward. The others are the inputs. Track both. If your inputs are improving but your citation rate isn't moving, the issue is likely entity consistency or brand search volume rather than citation volume alone.

Frequently Asked Questions

What sources does AI cite most often?

AI platforms cite third-party sources in the vast majority of responses. Reddit accounts for approximately 40% of AI citations. Review sites, industry publications, comparison articles, and news coverage follow. Brand websites account for approximately 9% of AI-generated answers. Gemini cites sources in 30.4% of responses, ChatGPT in 28.6%, Claude in 8.7%, and Google AI Overviews in 3.1%.

How do you build citations for AI search?

The most effective approach prioritises four source types: Reddit (genuine community presence in category-relevant subreddits), review platforms (systematic collection on Trustpilot, G2, or category-specific sites), comparison and best-of articles (earn inclusion in articles that list top providers), and industry publication coverage (earned media from respected outlets). Avoid promotional content — AI systems discount it. Focus on genuine third-party endorsement from independent sources.

How long does an AI citation strategy take to work?

Real-time AI results can reflect new citations within weeks of content being indexed. Training data improvements take longer, reflecting in the next model update cycle — typically 6-18 months out. A citation programme with consistent effort typically shows measurable AI visibility improvements within 3-6 months for real-time platforms like ChatGPT with browsing enabled and Gemini.

Does your own website content count as an AI citation?

Partially. When AI platforms browse in real time, they can access your website. But 91% of AI-generated answers cite third-party sources. Your own content helps by providing clean, direct-answer information that AI can extract — but it cannot substitute for genuine third-party endorsement from independent sources.

Build a Citation Programme That Drives AI Visibility

We identify exactly where your brand is and isn't being cited across AI platforms, map the citation gaps, and build a systematic programme to close them. Most clients see measurable AI visibility improvements within 90 days.

Book a call

Related Articles